California Self-Driving Car Accident Lawyer
Self-Driving Car Accident Lawyers at The Capital Law Firm:
- 50+ YEARS COMBINED EXPERIENCE
- INTEGRITY-DRIVEN RESULTS
- COMPENSATION CHAMPIONS
WHEN WE FIGHT FOR YOU,
IT’S PERSONAL.
The dream of a fully autonomous vehicle is no longer science fiction in California, where robotaxis and semi-autonomous vehicles are now a daily reality. However, for those involved in a collision with a self-driving car, this innovation presents a complex legal challenge. Unlike a traditional car accident, an incident with a self-driving car is a battle for digital evidence and corporate accountability. Navigating this new legal frontier requires a specialized understanding that goes far beyond a typical personal injury claim.
The Rise of Self-Driving Cars and Legal Challenges in California
The legal and operational landscape for autonomous vehicles (AVs) in California is rapidly evolving. The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) reported a 37% increase in registered AVs for testing from 2021 to 2023, with 1,603 AVs permitted for test-ready use. Companies like Waymo now operate commercial robotaxi services in major metropolitan areas, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, making these vehicles a regular part of the transportation ecosystem. This growth highlights the increasing likelihood of an accident with an AV.
Deconstructing Driving Automation: The SAE Levels of Autonomy
To understand liability, one must first grasp the technical capabilities of the vehicle at the time of the collision. The legal and engineering community relies on the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J3016 classification system, which defines six levels of driving automation.
A Level 2 vehicle, such as one with Tesla’s Autopilot, provides “Partial Driving Automation” where the human driver must be in the driver’s seat, ready to take control. The driver is legally responsible for monitoring the environment and is often the focus of a negligence claim. In contrast, a Level 4 system, like a Waymo robotaxi, offers “High Driving Automation” where the automated system handles all driving functions within a limited operational domain, and no human intervention is required. The distinction between these levels is the single most important factor in determining who is at fault in a collision.
The following list provides a clear breakdown of the SAE levels:
- Level 0 (No Automation): The driver performs all driving tasks. The vehicle may provide warnings or assistance.
- Level 1 (Driver Assistance): The vehicle features a single automated system for assistance, such as steering or accelerating (e.g., adaptive cruise control).
- Level 2 (Partial Automation): The vehicle can control both steering and accelerating/decelerating, but a human must remain ready to take control at any time. Examples include Tesla Autopilot.
- Level 3 (Conditional Automation): The system can handle all driving functions within specific conditions, but the driver must be ready to take over when alerted.
- Level 4 (High Automation): The system can perform all driving functions and even handle a “minimal risk condition” within a specified operating domain. The driver is not required to intervene. Waymo’s commercial robotaxis are an example.
- Level 5 (Full Automation): No human intervention is ever required. The vehicle can drive itself anywhere under all conditions. This is a fully conceptual vehicle, not yet commercial.
Why You Need a California Self-Driving Car Accident Lawyer
A self-driving car accident is a complex legal challenge. A legal team with experience in this nascent area of law can provide invaluable support by:
- Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The law firm understands both the technical complexities of autonomous systems and the evolving legal precedents.
- Fighting for Your Rights: A law firm can level the playing field by using the legal process to subpoena proprietary data and hold powerful corporations accountable.
- Securing Your Future: A specialized attorney can build a compelling case to pursue full compensation for all damages, including medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering.
Understanding Liability: Who is at Fault in a Self-Driving Car Accident?
In a traditional car accident, the legal inquiry is straightforward: did a human driver act negligently? This theory of negligence is often insufficient for AV accidents, as the inquiry has shifted to product liability, a powerful theory that holds manufacturers accountable for injuries caused by defective products. California law requires manufacturers to maintain financial responsibility to cover damages from their AVs. The core of a product liability claim is strict liability, which allows a plaintiff to secure compensation without proving the manufacturer was at fault.
A legal argument in a Level 2 AV crash can argue that the vehicle’s design is defective because it lulls the human driver into a false sense of security, placing accountability on the corporation.
In an AV accident, numerous parties may share liability:
- The Human Operator: For vehicles requiring human supervision (Levels 2 and 3), the operator may be liable if they were negligent or failed to intervene.
- The Vehicle Manufacturer: If the accident was caused by a design flaw, a defect in production, or misleading claims.
- The Software Developer: If a bug in the AI algorithm led to the crash.
- Third-Party Suppliers: If a defective component, such as a sensor, was the cause.
How a Self-Driving Car Accident is Different from a Traditional Car Accident
One of the most significant challenges in an AV accident is the collection of evidence. Unlike a traditional collision, where physical evidence is paramount, the most critical evidence in an AV crash is digital and proprietary. Autonomous vehicles are equipped with Event Data Recorders (EDRs), or “black boxes,” which capture a “snapshot” of the seconds before, during, and after a collision. This digital evidence creates a profound information asymmetry that challenges the traditional fault-based liability system. The vehicle’s data is owned and controlled by the company being sued, putting the victim at a massive disadvantage. For example, in a high-profile fatal crash case, a manufacturer was accused of withholding “collision snapshot” data for years, forcing plaintiffs to file a lawsuit just to gain access to the crucial information.
The following list summarizes the key differences:
- Primary Theory of Liability: Shifts from human negligence to product liability and negligence.
- Most Important Evidence: Changes from physical evidence to digital data from the vehicle’s “black box” and sensor logs.
- Key Challenges: The manufacturer controls the most critical evidence, creating a profound information asymmetry.
- The Legal Battle: Focuses on subpoenas and complex discovery battles to force corporations to release proprietary data.
Every Case Is our Personal Mission
California's Legal Framework for Autonomous Vehicles
The DMV is the key agency overseeing testing and deployment in California. The state’s legal framework is defined by the California Vehicle Code (§ 38750), which imposes significant responsibilities on AV manufacturers. These companies are required to:
- Equip vehicles with a data recorder that captures at least 30 seconds of pre-collision sensor data.
- Provide a way for the operator to easily engage or disengage the autonomous system.
- Maintain proof of financial responsibility to cover potential damages.
- Report any collision that results in property damage, bodily injury, or death to the DMV within 10 days.
Despite these regulations, jury verdicts can be inconsistent. The case of Molander v. Tesla Inc. in Riverside, California, highlights this unpredictability. The jury sided with Tesla, finding the driver at fault and no manufacturing defect. Conversely, other cases have resulted in massive payouts. This conflicting precedent underscores that the law is not settled and that the outcome hinges on the specific facts and the strength of the legal team’s argument.
What to Do After a Self-Driving Car Accident
In the immediate aftermath of an AV accident, the steps a victim takes can be critical.
- Step 1: Prioritize safety and medical care. Check for injuries and call 911 immediately. Injuries like whiplash may not appear for days.
- Step 2: Document everything. Take photos and videos of the scene and the AV’s unique components, like sensors and displays. This can be crucial evidence later on.
- Step 3: Contact the AV operator. Since there may be no human driver, obtain the company name, vehicle ID, and a claim number, which can be found on the vehicle or in its app.
- Step 4: File your California DMV SR-1 report. This is required within 10 days if the accident resulted in an injury or property damage exceeding $1,000.
This need to collect specific technical evidence highlights a fundamental vulnerability for victims and the clear need for a specialized legal professional.
Common Injuries from Self-Driving Car Accidents
Like traditional car accidents, collisions involving autonomous vehicles can result in a wide range of injuries. Victims may be eligible for compensation to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Common injuries include:
- Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI): Caused by the violent shaking of the brain within the skull. TBIs can range from a concussion to long-term disability or death.
- Spinal Cord and Back Injuries: The immense forces of a collision can cause serious damage to the spine. Injuries can range from whiplash to more severe spinal cord damage that can lead to paralysis.
- Fractures and Broken Bones: The impact of a crash can cause broken bones in the legs, arms, ribs, and pelvis, which may require surgery.
- Internal Injuries and Soft Tissue Damage: A collision can cause internal bleeding, requiring emergency medical attention, or soft tissue injuries like sprains and strains that cause long-term pain.
It is vital to seek immediate medical attention, as many injuries may not present symptoms for days or even weeks after the incident.
Image Source: Scharfsinn/Shutterstock
Your Ally in the Autonomous Age
A self-driving car accident is a collision with the future. Do not navigate this new legal frontier alone. The Capital Law Firm is a trusted ally, uniquely equipped to fight for your rights and secure the justice you deserve.
For a free consultation, contact The Capital Law Firm at (310) 363-0403 or fill out the on-page form today.
Why Choose THE CAPITAL LAW FIRM?
READ REAL client testimonials
Josh thanks for helping me with my car accident. Your office truly did everything to help me. My car was paid out fast and at top dollar! Josh called me…
Jonathan Morelos
I was in a car accident when my Lyft got rear ended by a pretty big car. I had neck issues and lots of back pain and needed help with my case. I was referred…
Michael Shaouli
I want to very much say thank you to Joshua Zokaeem and his staff for the way my car accident case was handled. I generally am not one to leave…